Religious Jewish Newspaper Apologizes for Altering Photograph
Di Tzeitung, an orthodox Jewish newspaper has apologized for altering a photograph in the newspaper of Barack Obama and his deputies supervising an operation carried by navy army officials that killed Osama bin Laden. Hillary Clinton and Audrey Tomason, the counterterrorism director, were removed from the image as Di Tzeitung cites religious rules such as banning pictures of women in the newspaper, with the belief that showing pictures of females disrespects them.
(Source: Siasat.pk, www.siasat.pk)
The original photograph before being digitally manipulated with Hillary Clinton and Audrey Tomason.
(Source: Vos Iz Neias, www.vosizneias.com)
The manipulated photo published in Di Tzeitung without the two women.
In my opinion, I believe it was not right for Di Tzeitung to have manipulated the picture and published it. But I also believe the incident happened because of the difference of contextual aspects that both parties come from. In the aspects of semiotics, Kress & van Leeuwan (2006, p.7) states that representations are made out of complexities that arise from cultural, social and psychological factors focused by a specific context. They also state that visual communication expresses meanings that are structured by different cultures through the semiotic process (Kress & van Leeuwan 2006, p.19).
Another occurrence similar to this one would be the Nikolai Yezhov and Joseph Stalin photo manipulation in Russia. Stalin, Premier of the Soviet Union, saw Yezhov, who was the chief of Soviet secret service, as a threat to the people and had him murdered (University of Minnesota n.d.). Pictures taken of him were also erased with the attempt to remove him from history.
(Source: University of Minnesota, www.tc.umn.edu)
The original picture of Stalin and Yezhov walking side by side above and the manipulated one below where Yezhov was digitally removed.
(Source: University of Minnesota, www.tc.umn.edu)
According to Lester (1999), photographers have the accountability to depict only authentic photographs and are in no position to manipulate pictures or distort facts. As stated Patterson & Wilkins (2002, p.212), photography should not deceive audiences who expect it to be an exact depiction of reality. Therefore, under the circumstance of proper publication, design and photojournalism ethics, it was not right for the Di Tzietung news papers to have manipulated the picture.
References
- Kress, G & Leeuwan, V 2006, Reading Images: The Grammar Of Visual Design, 2nd edn, Routledge, New York.
- Lester, P 1999, Chapter Six: Picture Manipulations, California State University of Fullerton, viewed 13 November 2011, <http://commfaculty.fullerton.edu/lester/writings/chapter6.html>.
- n.d., Falsification of history, University of Minnesota, viewed 13 November 2011, <http://www.tc.umn.edu/~hick0088/classes/csci_2101/false.html>.
- Patterson, P & Wilkins, L 2002, Media Ethics: Issues & Cases, 4th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York.